Tuesday, January 31, 2012

A Great Leader Builds A Great Team—Part 2, Would You Hire This Person?

By George McQuain

Let’s assume you are hiring a new member for your team. While reviewing the resumes/CVs of potential candidates, you come across a resume that contains the following “accomplishments”:

1.     She/he started two businesses that both failed

2.     She/he ran for political office six times and lost all six times

3.     Knowing one of her/his references, you call them and find out that she/he has gone through many “bad” circumstances in their life and that he/she may suffer from depression

Now, would you interview this person or offer them a job on your team?

If you said “No”, you just failed to interview and/or hire Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the United States and, arguably, one of the greatest leaders and statesmen to ever live.

In my last blog entry, I wrote about hiring people based upon the attributes/attitudes needed for the role you are trying to fill and tailoring your hiring process and interview questions so that you make sure that the candidate hired has those attributes and attitudes. Today, I am going to address three very important attributes/attitudes that I think are critical and often overlooked in hiring—tenacity, humility and the willingness to learn. In my opinion, these three attributes/attitudes are critical in hiring for a leadership position, a turnaround or for a start-up team that will be charting new territories for your organization. In fact, tenacious and humble are the two main attributes/attitudes of leaders who are “Level 5” leaders in Jim Collins’ book Good to Great--Why Some Companies Make the Leap... and Others Don't.

If you study the life of Abraham Lincoln, you will find that he demonstrated all three of these attributes/attitudes.

On numerous occasions during the U.S. Civil War, Union forces lost battles and many people called for Lincoln to end the war. Lincoln persisted and persevered, continuously searching for a way to achieve victory. He was tenacious in his belief in the Union cause and that victory could be won. Lincoln demonstrated an ability to withstand adversity and to move forward in the face of losses. Lincoln had an intense will to win and a do or die attitude. He knew what was important and never wavered in his pursuit of it.

Lincoln often demonstrated humility in his interaction with people and in doing his job (President of the United States) in such a way that put mission first (preserving the Union), team second (the army and people of the Union) and himself last. We also see Lincoln’s humility demonstrated in his interaction with others and in his habit of giving the credit for success to others. An example of Lincoln’s humility, is that after he delivered the Gettysburg Address (which some believe is one of the greatest speeches in U.S. history) Lincoln received a letter from Edward Everett who spoke for two hours just before Lincoln spoke. In the letter Everett praised Lincoln for his eloquent and concise speech, saying, "I should be glad if I could flatter myself that I came as near to the central idea of the occasion, in two hours, as you did in two minutes." Lincoln replied that he was glad to know the speech was not a "total failure" (The Lincoln Forum: Abraham Lincoln Gettysburg, and the Civil War by John Y. Simon, Harold Holzer and William D. Pederson). Lincoln appointed one of the best and brightest cabinets in U.S. history (individuals who were also some of his greatest political rivals) because he was focused on his mission, not on appointing people who he would outshine and make him look good.

Lastly, Lincoln had a willingness to learn. It is well documented that Lincoln was an avid reader and that he read most, if not all, of the books in the Library of Congress on military strategy because he knew that military strategy was central to his mission (preserving the Union) and he knew very little about the subject. Lincoln often sought and used feedback, asked questions, sought the input of people from numerous, often different and “off the wall”, perspectives, and learned from his mistakes. He didn’t object when people disagreed with him.

Interestingly, a willingness to learn is often very closely tied to tenacity and being humble. Tenacity, at its core, means doing whatever it takes to be successful and often you have to learn what that is. Being humble recognizes that you do not know everything and you are willing to try new approaches and learn from others to be successful.

I’ll close my discussion of Abraham Lincoln with what Leo Tolstoy; the great Russian author said of him, “He really was not a great general like Napoleon or Washington; he was not such a skilful statesman as Gladstone or Frederick the Great; but his supremacy expresses itself altogether in his peculiar moral power and in the greatness of his character.”

Now, how do you go about hiring someone with these attributes/attitudes? I admit it’s not easy and that it will require you, as a leader, to possess these same attributes and attitudes.

If you look at Lincoln’s “resume” at the beginning of this post, you will see hints at his unwillingness to quit, but often, you will need to interview the candidate with these attitudes/attributes in mind or put them through a battery of “personality assessments”. Regardless, it will take digging and work on your part.

Here are a sample of some possible interview questions:

1.     Describe your most challenging assignment, and how you met the challenge.

2.     Describe a situation that did not turn out as you planned.  What was your reaction? What did you learn from it?

3.     Describe a situation at work where someone created a problem for you.  What did you do to resolve it?

4.     Tell me about the biggest failure in your life. What was your reaction? What did you learn from it?

5.     Tell me about the biggest success in your life. Was it difficult? How did you go about achieving it? What setbacks did you need to overcome to achieve this success?

6.     What is your philosophy of sharing credit for a success? What is your philosophy of sharing blame for a failure? Give me an example of when you put these philosophies into practice.

7.     What new knowledge and skills did you learn from your last job? How did you learn them?

8.     Tell me about a time when you took on a role or project that you knew nothing about. What did you do?

9.     If you had to build a team, what types of people would you ask to be on that team?

10.  How do you deal with people who have a different opinion than yours on how to complete a project?

Use these types of questions to gain an understanding of the person you are interviewing so that you will be able to determine if they are tenacious, humble and willing to learn. In our often risk averse world, it is sometimes worth it to overlook an occasional “failure” and focus on what the candidate learned from the experience. Often, what the candidate learned in their “failure”, their willingness to keep on trying and never give up and their willingness to give credit to others will be much more valuable to you than what someone with a “perfect” career has learned and experienced. Who knows, you might hire the next Abraham Lincoln.

No comments:

Post a Comment